Treated nets vs house spraying.

نویسندگان

  • C Curtis
  • A Mnzava
چکیده

Editor – In a recent letter (1) Dr Christian Lengeler dismisses as invalid our comparisons (2) of recent trials with pyrethroid-treated nets versus trials 20–40 years ago with house spraying of non-pyrethroid insecticides. One of his reasons is that the initial intensities of malaria transmission were different in the trials compared. Lengeler may postulate that the lower intensity of transmission in the Pare Taveta and Garki spraying trials versus the Bagomoyo, Muheza and Ougadougou net or curtain trials explain why these spraying trials worked better. However, he cannot then explain away the fact that the Kisumu spraying trial worked better than theKilifi net trial because, in that comparison, it was the spraying that was up against the higher initial transmission conditions. As we mentioned, publication is expected soon of data from a net trial at Kisumu, and a more exact comparison of those data with the earlier spraying trial there should then be possible. Lengeler points out that at the time of the spraying trials the parasite populations were fully susceptible to choloroquine and the general health services may have been better than today. However, as we pointed out, the Kisumu and Garki trials had unsprayed comparison areas and for all the trials there were baseline data. Our tables showed how well the spraying worked in comparison with those controls, where presumably highly effective chloroquine and other treatments were as available as in the sprayed areas. Like Lengeler, we raised the question whether pyrethroid-treated nets may be the best we can hope for in the real present-day world. We certainly do not underestimate the difficulty of organizing and funding nationwide spraying in tropical Africa. However, we should not forget that in the 1950s, with generous assistance from donors and unflinching political will, India (which was then far less developed than it is now) did organize a successful nationwide spraying programme. We pointed out that deployment of a given type of insecticide on a bednet might a priori be expected to be more effective and economic than the same insecticide sprayed on walls. We cited some evidence that appropriate nonpyrethroids can work better on nets than do pyrethroids, which may drive mosquitoes away before they have picked up a lethal dose. We now have more such evidence and are planning further studies to determine whether, by using an insecticide which gives higher mosquito mortality than do pyrethroids, one can reproduce the best malaria control results of the past without the need for spray pumps and teams of spraymen. n

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Comparison of malaria control interventions.

Editor – The paper by Curtis & Mnzava (1) dealing with the comparison of residual house spraying and insecticide-treated nets for malaria control is timely, since important strategic choices have to be made in the Roll Back Malaria partnership. Experience in comparing these two key vector control interventions has recently become available and such a review is therefore welcome. The comparisons...

متن کامل

Comparison of house spraying and insecticide-treated nets for malaria control.

The efficacies of using residual house spraying and insecticide-treated nets against malaria vectors are compared, using data from six recent comparisons in Africa, Asia and Melanesia. By all the entomological and malariological criteria recorded, pyrethroid-treated nets were at least as efficacious as house spraying with dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), malathion or a pyrethroid. However...

متن کامل

Correction: Combination of Insecticide Treated Nets and Indoor Residual Spraying in Northern Tanzania Provides Additional Reduction in Vector Population Density and Malaria Transmission Rates Compared to Insecticide Treated Nets Alone: A Randomised Control Trial

Reference 1. Protopopoff N, Wright A, West PA, Tigererwa R, Mosha FW, KisinzaW, et al. (2015) Combination of Insecticide Treated Nets and Indoor Residual Spraying in Northern Tanzania Provides Additional Reduction in Vector Population Density and Malaria Transmission Rates Compared to Insecticide Treated Nets Alone: A Randomised Control Trial. PLoS ONE 10(11): e0142671. doi:10.1371/journal. pon...

متن کامل

Rapid improvements to rural Ugandan housing and their association with malaria from intense to reduced transmission: a cohort study

BACKGROUND Rapid population growth in Africa requires an urgent expansion and improvement of housing options. Improving housing presents a promising opportunity for malaria control by reducing indoor exposure to mosquitoes. We measured recent changes in house design in rural Uganda and evaluated their association with malaria in relation to a mass scale-up of control efforts. METHODS This ana...

متن کامل

Combination of Insecticide Treated Nets and Indoor Residual Spraying in Northern Tanzania Provides Additional Reduction in Vector Population Density and Malaria Transmission Rates Compared to Insecticide Treated Nets Alone: A Randomised Control Trial

Indoor residual spraying (IRS) combined with insecticide treated nets (ITN) has been implemented together in several sub-Saharan countries with inconclusive evidence that the combined intervention provides added benefit. The impact on malaria transmission was evaluated in a cluster randomised trial comparing two rounds of IRS with bendiocarb plus universal coverage ITNs, with ITNs alone in nort...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Bulletin of the World Health Organization

دوره 79 7  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2001